A derelict abbey in
the middle of the woods. Ghostly nuns pouring in from all quarters. A
graveyard. In theory, Corin Hardy’s The Nun had the perfect ingredients to make
a terrifying horror film that could have sent shivers down the audience’s
spine.
But sadly that didn’t
happen. Instead, the confused storylines, loose ends and religious mumbo-jumbo
made the film a flat bore. And that’s a shame, considering it is the fifth
installment in the Conjuring franchise, which had given some good scares
before.
While it had potential
to give us sleepless nights, (let’s be honest, the trailer terrified us), we
got a rather confused and dreary film that made us raise an eyebrow
occasionally, forget about any spine-chilling moments. It’s like ordering a
biryani and ending up with rice and curd, with a sprinkle of pickle.
THE NUN
We saw our Nun Valak
running around haunting demonologist Lorraine in The Conjuring 2. Encouraged by
the audience’s response, director Corin Hardy decided to give the demonic
entity a proper story.
The Nun revolves
around a priest who along with a young nun, have been summoned to a desolate
abbey in Romania, after a nun is found hanging at the abbey. It is
meant to be an investigation, but hell is soon unleashed.
Despite their flaws,
the Conjuring franchise still managed to keep the audience’s interest. It could
also probably because of choice of actors like Vera Farmiga and Owen
Wilson. Yet, though Vera’s sister Taissa, who plays Sister Irene in The Nun,
bears a striking resemblance to Vera, couldn’t offer much to her role as the
terrified nun. The dialogues are also very staid, and the ending leaves you rather
baffled. There was hardly any mystery that needed to be solved as well.
Ironically, more than
the horror elements, it’s the comic timing by Jonas Bloquet that almost saves
the day. Almost.
The Nun follows the
horror film textbook closely and every possible cliché, that you can think of,
to the extent that even the jump scares become predictable. It’s now quite
annoying to watch characters chase after ghostly people in graveyards, or
continue staying in a haunted abbey, after being buried alive. There
are some outright bizarre things such as a boy spitting out snakes as well, and
you can’t help but say “What? Why?”
There’s a confused
blend of history and religion as well, and some elements are shoehorned into
the story conveniently. You can’t even help laughing at points.
THE CONJURING
FRANCHISE
The first Conjuring
film introduced us to Ed and Lorraine Warren, played by Owen Wilson and Vera
Farmiga. These characters were inspired by the real-life demonologists, who had
experienced supernatural horrors in their life- or so they say. We
were told the story of a happy family, living in a seemingly welcoming house in
Rhode Island. Of course, it’s a horror film, and a house has to be haunted.
The first half of the
film provided some good shivers, like the demon sitting on the wardrobe and
flying down to attack the daughter, or the random sounds in the house that
could make the sparse hairs on your neck stand up. The second half was a little
stretched and dragged, especially after the demon’s mystery was unraveled.
However, all said and
done, the Conjuring was a decent film from the supernatural genre. It made good
use of done-to-death horror elements like a haunted house, creepy
cellars, and scary dolls. There was no excessive gore, and annoying
camera shaking, Moreover, the performances of Vera Farmiga and Owen Wilson
carried the film through.
Emboldened by the
success of Conjuring, the makers churned out prequels Annabelle, Annabelle: The
Creation and Conjuring 2. And so the Conjuring Universe was established.
Nun Valak makes her
appearance in Conjuring 2 (2016), and this time on English soil. The demonic
entity popped in every corner of the house and haunted Lorraine. However,
despite some horrifying moments, Conjuring 2 could not conjure the same
interest and fear that Conjuring had. It was getting a little weary to see
haunted houses. Apart from this, the film stretches on painfully, and it’s an
entire hour-and-a-half before something concrete happens.
Annabelle revolved
around the hideous and terrifying doll of the same name, (enough to scare
children from ever buying dolls), who incites a wave of violence in the house
she has been brought into. The film had a few good frightening
moments, yet for those who have seen the film Rosemary’s Baby, or rather any
film that producer James Wan (who is responsible for the Conjuring franchise)
has had a say in, will know how the story will pan out in the first 30 minutes
itself.
Annabelle: The
Creation (2017) redeemed its prequel. The doll was awakened by pesky
children, and it ran around on a murderous rampage. The film is
actually better than Conjuring 2 as well, as it relied more on atmosphere and
frightening symbolism. It wasn’t perfect by any means, but its gothic approach
revived some interest in the Conjuring universe, which Annabelle had
singlehandedly killed.
A HORROR FILM NEEDS
MORE THAN JUMP SCARES
It’s 2018, and
directors tend to forget that jump scares alone don’t make a horror film. There
has to be a cohesive story, as well. Horror can be conveyed in expressions,
inanimate objects, soft haunting music, atmosphere and symbolism as well, not
just a pair of random hands coming out of nowhere, to strangle you.
Let’s recall
some other films from the genre that actually did give us sleepless nights. Steamrolling
over the tepid Paranormal Activity franchise, there aren’t too many horror
films from recent years as filmmakers would often get carried away with
terrifying the audience rather than concentrating on a cogent
storyline. In the end, horror becomes comical. In this respect,
there are films like the gruesome Evil Dead, Cabin In The Woods, where the story
was buried under ugly and bloody demons.
The film Sinister
(2012) told the ghoulish tale of the demon Boghuul who possessed children to
kill their parents. The gory deeds would be filmed on camera, and renamed as
family home videos. Terrible as it sounds, the unraveling of the
mystery for horror film lovers was of far more interest, rather than the jump
scares, which just enhanced the effect.
The Insidious series
received mixed reviews from critics. Yet, while the story had much promise, the
film used age-old horror tropes. There was a ghost child running around and a
random monstrous red demon would appear out of nowhere sharpening his claws.
The interesting part of the story, which was the astral plane called “The
Further”, which dragged on painfully at points. The film wasn’t
entirely a loss, it had its moments where you did feel intrigued. The same
can’t be said about Insidious 2.
It (2017) is another
example of an interesting film from the genre. While it might have had its
flaws, it was also a dark psychological thriller at its core, where a clown
preyed on the fears of children. And it’s the children, who set out to take
down the clown Pennywise.
Of course, we could
travel back to the days of The Shining, The Exorcist, Cujo, The Exorcism of
Emily Rose- days when horror films relied on a substantial story, rather than
just frightening settings and a background score. Indeed, the horror films of
yore.